http://www.popcenter.org/problems/street_prostitution/PDFs/Newburn_1999.pdf
This, in effect was a literature review in 1999. The following is the bullet-pointed conclusion:
- police corruption is pervasive, continuing and not bounded by rank;
- any definition of corruption should cover both ‘financial’ and ‘process’corruption, and should
- acknowledge the varying means, ends and motives of corrupt activities;
- the boundary between ‘corrupt’ and ‘non-corrupt’ activities is difficult to define,
- primarily because this is at heart an ethical problem;
- police corruption cannot simply be explained as the product of a few ‘bad apples’;
- the ‘causes’ of corruption include: factors that are intrinsic to policing as a job;
- the nature of police organisations; the nature of ‘police culture’; theopportunities for corruption
- presented by the ‘political’ and ‘task’ environments’;and, the nature and extent of the effort
- put in to controlling corruption;
- some areas of policing are more prone to corruption than others;
- although there are many barriers to successful corruption control,
- there is evidence that police agencies can be reformed;
- reform needs to go beyond the immediately identified problem;
- reform must look at the political and task environments as well as the organisation itself;
- reform tends not to be durable; and
- continued vigilance and scepticism is vital.
http://collection.europarchive.org/tna/20040722020910/homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/rdsolr1103.pdf
This is from 2002/3 and describes some British police corruption. There is a large literature. with
little sign of linking corruption with bad work from the “users” point of view, or the evasion of
this through hapless statistics. – giving up, the page editor has gone haywire.